work Dimply

The upstream problem nobody named first.

Partner Dimply
Engagement Design Partnership
Duration Ongoing
Scope Positioning, Product Design, Visual Language
Dimply — design work
Output
  • → Category positioning framework
  • → Feature architecture and naming
  • → 53 product visualisations
  • → Platform visual language
  • → Website design and direction
Key number
53

Product visualisations created once the upstream positioning was clear

Engagement type

This is a Design Partnership. Ongoing embedded work across positioning, product, and brand. Not a one-off project.

The situation

Dimply had built a genuinely powerful platform. A branding agency had delivered a strong visual foundation. A sitemap existed. Content was being written. On paper, everything was in place to build a website.


But something kept not working. Sections felt like parts rather than a whole. Pages were designed, redesigned, and set aside. The founder was visibly blocked.

The diagnosis

The real problem wasn't execution. Nobody had clearly defined what Dimply actually was yet. Six months in, we stopped and went upstream.

Six months in, we stopped and went upstream.

What emerged was clear: Dimply needed to lead with category ownership as the Financial Experience Platform, and then productise its individual features so each one could stand on its own. Once that structure existed, everything downstream moved.

The outcome

Once that structure existed, everything downstream moved. Content made sense. Page hierarchy became obvious. The design had something to carry.


We produced 53 product visualisations, a new visual language for a complex platform, so that a product team at a bank could look at the site and immediately understand what they were looking at.

The lesson
Mess upstream → generic output downstream.
Alignment upstream → premium output downstream.

Most teams try to fix the surface.
The leverage is almost always higher up.
Next case study
Mastercard →